Robison v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence sufficient despite fact “that the plaintiff was able to return to his work 75 days after the accident and that he worked steadily thereafter”
• “In view of the plaintiffs age and the evidence as to the discomfort involved in the performance of his duties and as to his impaired agility, the trier of fact could properly find that he was reasonably certain to suffer a loss of future earnings_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).