Skip to main content
· 4/3/2000

Robinson v. Upole

Citations

  • 750 A.2d 339
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 104
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there is a question of fact where the plaintiff could no longer do physical activities including housework or recreation without pain and could not sleep
  • plaintiff was able to resume working albeit with limitations, but could no longer perform certain recreational activities
  • although plaintiff returned to work at unspecified point, she suffered chronic pain syndrome, fibromyalgia and sleep impairment, has severely reduced ability to perform recreational activities and had to hire housekeeper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Johnson, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.