Robinson v. TCI/US West Communications Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the substantially greater scope of discovery under American law does not bar transfer to England on ground of f.n.c.
• holding that the substantially greater scope of discovery under American law does not bar transfer to England on ground of f.n.c.
• expressing agreement with Zoelsch’s criticism of the emphasis on policy considerations in some of the cases
• describing the court's task of determining jurisdiction as \ 'fill[ing] the void' created by a combination of congressional silence and the growth of international commerce since the Exchange Act was passed\
• affirming referral of securities fraud claims to England on ground of f.n.c.
• describing return jurisdiction clause as “part of a larger set of measures needed to ensure that defendants will hot attempt to evade the jurisdiction of the foreign courts which may also include agreements between the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).