Skip to main content

Robinson v. State

Citations

  • 240 S.W.3d 919
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1669
  • 2007 WL 4146639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court has no duty to rule on a pro se motion filed by an accused represented by counsel
  • concluding that “a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel”
  • holding that a trial court has no duty to rule on a pro se motion filed by an accused represented by counsel
  • holding that a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions filed by a defendant represented by counsel because a defendant has no right to hybrid 3 representation
  • holding that when a trial court rules on the merits of a pro se motion presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel, such ruling is subject to appellate review
  • holding that trial court is free to disregard pro se motions of a defendant represented by counsel, but once a court chooses to rule on such motions, that those decisions are reviewable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Meyers, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Price, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

379 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.