Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/21/2007
Robinson v. State
Citations
- 240 S.W.3d 919
- 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1669
- 2007 WL 4146639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court has no duty to rule on a pro se motion filed by an accused represented by counsel
- concluding that “a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel”
- holding that a trial court has no duty to rule on a pro se motion filed by an accused represented by counsel
- holding that a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions filed by a defendant represented by counsel because a defendant has no right to hybrid 3 representation
- holding that when a trial court rules on the merits of a pro se motion presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel, such ruling is subject to appellate review
- holding that trial court is free to disregard pro se motions of a defendant represented by counsel, but once a court chooses to rule on such motions, that those decisions are reviewable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Womack, Meyers, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Price, Hervey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
379 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. GuidryTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-03· cited 108×
- Ex Parte BohannanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-05-11· cited 76×
- Trammell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-05-07· cited 45×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-05-28· cited 39×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-14· cited 37×
- In re FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2019-05-09· cited 33×
- Carl Darnell Gavin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-05-20· cited 20×
- Raymond Lee Cavitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-23· cited 19×
- Craig Porter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2017-12-19· cited 19×
- Cerf v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-04-12· cited 13×
- Marcos Melendez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-05-06· cited 12×
- Schindley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-08-11· cited 11×
- Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-23· cited 7×
- in Re Commitment of Curtis Lee AdamsTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2013-08-15· cited 7×
- Prible v. LumpkinFifth Circuit· 2022-08-08· cited 7×
- in Re Dan Vernon West, RelatorTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-08-26· cited 5×
- In Re KellumTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-11-04· cited 2×
- Rex Allen Stockton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-08-28
- in Re Marcus CooperTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-09-17
- O.D. Van Duren, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-07
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-25· cited 405×
- Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-04-20· cited 213×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-16· cited 194×
- Meyer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-30· cited 75×
- Fakeye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 65×
- Busselman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1986-06-12· cited 35×
- Froyd v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1982-06-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.