Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/10/1967
Robinson v. State
Citations
- 415 S.W.2d 180
- 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the abandonment of an enhancement paragraph was not an amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-03-13· cited 74×
- Tuan Anh Dang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-26· cited 73×
- Degay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-06-10· cited 26×
- Finklea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-31· cited 10×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-02-04· cited 8×
- Etchieson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1983-11-16· cited 7×
- in the Matter of S v.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-06-02
- Michael Larkin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-05-14
- Dang, Tuan AnhCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-26
- Randyael Dontrell Tyson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-02-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1912-07-08· cited 14×
- Urtado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-12-10· cited 12×
- Guajardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-01-02· cited 7×
- Epperson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-10-28· cited 7×
- Steen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1952-10-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.