Robinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Testimony that a particular material is a controlled substance is of no relevance unless the State also proves the defendant's connection to that particular substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2004-05-27· cited 34×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-03-28· cited 30×
• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-02-11· cited 12×
• Crutcher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-04-12· cited 10×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-04-19· cited 9×
• Whitlock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-05-02· cited 5×
• Downing v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-04-08· cited 1×
• Cockerham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-11-23· cited 1×
• Freddie Walker v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2002-02-08
• Laquon Fluker a/k/a Laquon Akeem Fluker a/k/a Laquan Akeem Fluker v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2024-02-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ballenger v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 508×
• Wells v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-06-17· cited 101×
• Dancer v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-08-20· cited 83×
• Rushing v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-04-16· cited 62×
• Nalls v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 48×