Skip to main content
· 1/16/1985

Robinson v. Royal Bank of Canada

Citations

  • 462 So. 2d 101
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 193
  • 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing rule and requiring stay of later filed Florida action in favor of previously filed Canadian action
  • where two actions involving the same parties and essentially the same issues are simultaneously pending, it is a departure from the essential requirements of the law to deny the motion to stay the second action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.