Robinson v. Robinson

Citations

• 212 N.E.3d 1181
• 2023 Ohio 1233

Syllabus

The domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion in using the date of the final hearing as the termination date for the marriage. Husband did not file a shared parenting plan, and the designation of Wife as the residential parent and legal custodian was in the children's best interest. The trial court correctly and conservatively determined Husband's income for purposes of spousal support, child support, and allocation of marital debt, and an abuse of discretion is not demonstrated. There was no testimony regarding the tax exemptions for the children other than Wife's asking for them, and the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the exemptions to Wife. Judgment affirmed.