Robinson v. Robinson
Citations
- 112 Miss. 224
- 72 So. 923
Syllabus
<p>1. Divorce. Alimony. Custody of children. Proceeding to modify decree. Payment of wife’s counsel fees.</p> <p>Tbe allowance of alimony is justified by tbe natural obligation of tbe husband as tbe bread winner of tbe family, to support his wife. If there is no legal ■ marriage of tbe parties, there is no legal obligation on tbe husband for this support or for alimony.</p> <p>2. Divorce. Custody of children. Proceedings to modify decree. Payment of wife’s counsel fees.</p> <p>Where a husband and wife have been divorced and the wife allowed alimony in a gross sum, the husband is not liable for the wife’s counsel fees in a subsequent proceeding to modify the final decree in the-divorce proceeding so as to award the custody of the children to the wife, since the parties were then legally strangers to each other and there being no statutory authority for such an allowance.</p>
Judges: Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- East v. EastMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 129×
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-08-04· cited 92×
- Wray v. LangstonMississippi Supreme Court· 1980-03-05· cited 25×
- Louk v. LoukMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-06-22· cited 23×
- LATHAM, GUARDIAN, ETC. v. LathamMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-02-28· cited 15×
- Craft v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-10-02· cited 14×
- Lindsey v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court· 1954-01-11· cited 11×
- Patricia A. Louk v. John Mark LoukMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-10-16
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.