Robinson v. Robinson
Citations
- 79 Cal. 511
- 21 P. 1095
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 762
Syllabus
<p>Divorce—Alimony—Counsel Fees—Form of Decree — Charge on Beal Estate.—A decree in a divorce suit adjudging that defendant pay to plaintiff’s attorney one hundred dollars as counsel fees of plaintiff, and providing that all alimony, fees, and costs allowed may be paid in the aggregate to the clerk, and that all shall be a lien on certain described real property of defendant, and if not paid, that execution or order of sale may issue for the whole on demand of plaintiff, and so much of defendant’s property sold thereunder as will satisfy the total amount, must be regarded as a decree in favor of plaintiff for the counsel fees, and is neither irregular nor void. .</p> <p>Id-— Allowance of Alimony in Gross — Discretion. — The superior court has power, under section 139 of the Civil Code, to make an allowance of alimony to the wife in a divorce suit in a gross sum. The allowance may be for the wife’s support during her life, and is not limited to periodical payments. An allowance having regard to the circumstances of the parties respectively of a sum less than a third in value of the husband’s estate, to an abused and injured wife in feeble health, with children to care for, is a proper exercise of discretion.</p>
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-12-11· cited 70×
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-06-21· cited 49×
- Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-09-28· cited 32×
- Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-04-26· cited 28×
- Bast v. BastMontana Supreme Court· 1923-06-26· cited 23×
- Glynn v. GlynnNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-12-08· cited 18×
- de Nobrega v. de NobregaHawaii Supreme Court· 1901-11-22· cited 13×
- De Roche v. De RocheNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-04-23· cited 11×
- Enders v. EndersIdaho Supreme Court· 1922-12-29· cited 10×
- Bristol v. BristolMontana Supreme Court· 1922-12-21· cited 10×
- DeVall v. DeVallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-01-26· cited 6×
- Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-04-24· cited 5×
- Cruikshank v. CruikshankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-01-14· cited 2×
- Gouthro v. WinstanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-10-24· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.