Robinson v. Robinson
Citations
- 77 Wash. 663
- 138 P. 288
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 959
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Vacation of Decree — Collusive Suit — Petition for Vacation — Sufficiency. A decree of divorce will not be vacated at the suit of the successful plaintiff, for fraud in obtaining it, and her petition is demurrable for want of sufficient facts, where the gist of the-petition was that her husband represented to her that the marriage embarrassed him financially and that he would get his business-affairs adjusted and remarry her within six months, and otherwise he would be compelled to leave the state and he would give her no financial assistance, it being alleged that she was finally persuaded to bring the action, consenting to go before the court and tell the-exact situation, which it appears she did not do, the inference from the allegations being that she testified falsely or suppressed material facts in the trial of the divorce case, resulting in findings sustaining-the decree of divorce; since the petition shows nothing more than a. collusive arrangement to obtain a divorce.</p>
Judges: Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hollingshead v. HollingsheadNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1920-02-27· cited 39×
- Cohen v. RandallSecond Circuit· 1943-07-20· cited 22×
- Kilbride v. KilbrideAppellate Court of Illinois· 1965-11-05· cited 8×
- Paffen v. PaffenNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1923-03-09· cited 2×
- Cooper v. CooperWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-07
- Romanski's EstateLuzerne County Orphans' Court· 1945-04-10
- McGraw v. McGrawSuperior Court of Rhode Island· 1927-02-19
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Karren v. KarrenUtah Supreme Court· 1902-07-05· cited 34×
- Ferry v. FerryWashington Supreme Court· 1894-06-26· cited 28×
- Meisenheimer v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court· 1909-09-27· cited 25×
- Morgan v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1914-01-08· cited 19×
- Pringle v. PringleWashington Supreme Court· 1909-09-29· cited 12×
- Whittley v. WhittleyNew York Supreme Court· 1908-07-15· cited 11×
- Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court· 1883-03-28· cited 11×
- McDonald v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court· 1904-03-12· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.