Robinson v. Orient Marine Co. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contractual provision between owner and charterer did not expand turnover duty owed to longshoreman
• holding that time-charter clause stating that “[c]harterers are to [p]erform all cargo handling at their risk and expense” shifted liability to charterer, but did not alter or expand Scindia duties otherwise owed to injured longshoreman
• providing that summary judgment is appropriate if the record evidence shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).