West Virginia Supreme Court· 6/24/1993
Robinson v. McKinney
Citations
- 432 S.E.2d 543
- 189 W. Va. 459
- 1993 W. Va. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that ‘“[t]he duty of a parent to support a child is a basic duty owed by the parent to the child’ ”
- recognizing parent’s duty to support child and child’s right to receive such support
- “The ten-year statute of limitations set forth in W. Va. Code, 38-3-18 [1923] and not the doctrine of laches applies when enforcing a decretal judgment which orders the payment of monthly sums for alimony or child support.”
- nunc pro tunc order may not be entered to set child support, where there was no memorandum on the records which indicated that support was to be addressed in the original order, and entry of nunc pro tunc order would adversely affect interests of obligor parent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McHUGH
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Powderidge Unit Owners Ass'n v. Highland Properties, Ltd.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-06-14· cited 207×
- Johnson v. NedeffWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 33×
- Savage v. BoothWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 27×
- Hayhurst v. ShepardWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-06-16· cited 19×
- Carter v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 17×
- Cottrill v. CottrillWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-05-12· cited 11×
- Barber v. BarberWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-10-16· cited 10×
- Shaffer v. StanleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 10×
- Downing v. AshleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 9×
- State Department of Health & Human Resources Ex Rel. Cline v. PentasugliaWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-04-14· cited 9×
- Lang v. IamsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-07-08· cited 8×
- Casdorph v. CasdorphWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-07-13· cited 8×
- In Re FRIEDA Q.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 6×
- Collins v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-12-13· cited 5×
- Burnett v. BurnettWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Barbara Jean S. v. Stephen Leo S.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-11-20· cited 5×
- Oak Casualty Insurance v. LechliterWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-12-03· cited 4×
- Clay v. ClayWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-12-10· cited 4×
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, Child Support Enforcement Division v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-11-21· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources v. SchwabWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-12-13· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blisset v. BlissetIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 90×
- Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-04-15· cited 72×
- Horton v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 44×
- Kimble v. KimbleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 31×
- Wyatt v. WyattWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-07-16· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Palumbo v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1966-09-13· cited 19×
- Hartley v. UngvariWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-07-13· cited 14×
- Grijalva v. GrijalvaWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-12-13· cited 9×
- Zanke v. ZankeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-04-02· cited 9×
- Hudson v. PeckWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-07-20· cited 6×
- Lauderback v. WadsworthWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-03-20· cited 6×
- Tinnell v. TinnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1984-12-21· cited 5×
Other cases named Robinson v. McKinney
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.