Robinson v. Johnson Supplemental opinion upon denial of rehearing - filed March 25, 2004 - added to end of this opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that plaintiffs “must comply with the time limit set forth by the [respondents-in-discovery statute” and the circuit court “did not have discretion *** to extend the six-month statutory period”
• remarking that plaintiffs “must comply with the time limit set forth by the [respondents-in-discovery] statute” and the circuit court - 19 - No. 1-19-0906 “did not have discretion *** to extend” the statutory period
• finding that statute of limitations within section 2-402 cannot be extended
• finding that statute of limitations within section 2-402 cannot be extended
• stating that supreme court decisions bind lower courts
• Rule 183's \plain language indicates that it only applies to the time limits set forth by the Illinois Supreme Court rules\; Rule 183 \simply does not apply to a statutory time limit\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).