Robinson v. Hill
Citations
- 60 Wash. 615
- 111 P. 871
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1111
Syllabus
<p>Master and Servant — Independent Contractors — Evidence of Relation — Admissibility. In an action for personal injuries, upon an issue as to whether the defendant employed the plaintiff or was only the lessor of the mill, evidence is admissible of conversations had with the defendant relative to a settlement of a prior accident with a casualty company at defendant’s suggestion, and as to defendant’s taking out casualty insurance covering accidents to the men.</p> <p>Master and Servant — Independent Contractor — Question for Jury. In an action for personal injuries, a question as to the existence of a contract between the defendant and a third person making such third person an independent contractor, upon disputed evidence, is one of fact, for the jury.</p>
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court· 1963-05-23· cited 170×
- Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-01-05· cited 39×
- North Bend Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-10-29· cited 25×
- Boten ex rel. Boten v. Sheffield Ice Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1914-04-18· cited 15×
- Barnett v. ButlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-05-27· cited 13×
- Finley v. CurleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-20· cited 4×
- Fehrenbacher v. Oakesdale Copper Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-09-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.