Skip to main content
· 7/29/1991

Robinson v. Hamed

Citations

  • 813 P.2d 171
  • 62 Wash. App. 92
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a union member to be collaterally estopped by the ruling in an arbitration proceeding in which the union, not the member, was the party
  • factual determination in an arbitration proceeding may be the basis for collateral estoppel in a subsequent judicial trial; plaintiff's assertion that doing so deprives him of his right to trial by jury is totally without merit
  • factual determination in an arbitration proceeding may be the basis for collateral estoppel in a subsequent judicial trial; plaintiff’s assertion that doing so deprives him of his right to trial by jury is totally without merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.