Skip to main content
· 3/30/2006

Robinson v. Golder

Citations

  • 443 F.3d 718
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7796
  • 2006 WL 806301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state postconviction application is “properly filed” for tolling purposes “if it satisfies the State’s requirements for filing such a pleading”
  • explaining that “[a] state post-conviction application is ‘properly filed’ if it satisfies the State’s requirements for filing such a pleading”
  • applying the anniversary method of calculating the § 2244(d)(1) one-year limitation period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, McKAY, Murphy, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.