Skip to main content
· 8/11/1978

Robinson v. Econ-O-Corporation

Citations

  • 379 N.E.2d 923
  • 62 Ill. App. 3d 958
  • 20 Ill. Dec. 90
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary- judgment for the defendant as to the malicious prosecution claim but affirming as to the IIED claim
  • reversing summary judgment because a question of fact existed as to whether the defendant had a “reasonable belief’ that the plaintiff had committed a crime at the time he filed a deceptive practices charge
  • reversing summary judgment because a question of fact existed as to whether the defendant had a \reasonable belief\ that the plaintiff had committed a crime at the time he filed a deceptive practices charge
  • malice means that the party is motivated by indirect and improper motives, which means any purpose other than bringing a guilty party to justice; the defendant signed a complaint on a returned check in order to collect a debt, and this was held to be “malice”
  • malice means that the party is motivated by indirect and improper motives, which means any purpose other than bringing a guilty party to justice; the defendant signed a complaint on a returned check in order to collect a debt, and this was held to be “malice”
  • reasonable belief is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.