Robinson v. Eagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No doctrine or case requires a potential protestor to be clairvoyant or to police an agency’s general noncompliance with the FAR on the possibility that such misfeasance might become relevant in a protest.”
• “[I]t seems unlikely that Trystan would experience an episode of dystonia that is caused by an injury in his basal ganglia one time in February 2009 and not experience any other motor problems for months.”
• “[I]t seems unlikely that Trystan would experience an episode of dystonia that is caused by an injury in his basal ganglia one time in February 2009 and not experience any other motor problems for months.”
• discussing the relevant FAR provisions in detail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).