Robinson v. DeFazio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• making same holding “pursuant to [section] 1154(b) and Collette [v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (Fed.Cir.1996)]
• discussing Collette and subsequent decisions of this Court interpreting section 1154(b) as reducing the eviden-tiary burden only as to the question of in-service incurrence
• making same holding pursuant to [section] 1154(b) and Collette [v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (Fed.Cir.1996)]
• § 1154(b) does not obviate the third requirement, e.g., medical evidence of nexus, of a well-grounded claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).