Robinson v. Clement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, rather than dismissing the petition, the trial court should have substituted the disciplinary board as a defendant when individual board members were named as respondents in their official capacities
• stating that a common law writ of certiorari cannot be used to attack the intrinsic correctness of the board’s decision nor to seek a re-weighing of the evidence
• where petitioner named prison guards and members of the prison disciplinary board as defendants but not the prison disciplinary board itself
• Tenn. R. Ap p. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).