Robinson v. Bunker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “[t]o be deemed sufficient, a petition need not even label the theory upon which a plaintiff seeks recovery”
• highlighting that the Court can affirm a judgment if it is “cognizable under any theory,” even if the trial court's reasoning was wrong or insufficient
• applying the law of the case doctrine to an issue the parties “fully litigated to a final judgment” and which the court of appeals decided
• stating article III, section 23 “limits the legislature in two distinct but related ways”
• stating article III, section 23 “limits the legislature in two distinct but related ways”
• “[i]n general, in calculating lost profits damages, lost revenue is estimated, and overhead expenses tied to the production of that income are deducted from the estimated lost revenue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).