Robinson v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff lacked standing in a candidacy eligibility challenge because “[nJeither [he] nor general election voters” were “in any way prevented [ ] from supporting their preferred candidate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Keyes v. Bowen
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-10-25· cited 268×
• Berg v. Obama
  Third Circuit· 2009-11-12· cited 51×
• Lindsay v. Bowen
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 14×
• CONSTITUTION PARTY OF SD v. Nelson
  D. South Dakota· 2010-08-04· cited 5×
• Anderson v. Griswold
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2023-12-19· cited 5×
• LaRoque v. Holder
  District of Columbia· 2010-12-20· cited 3×
• John Anthony Castro v. New Hampshire Secretary of State, David M. Scanlan, and Donald J. Trump
  D. New Hampshire· 2023-10-27· cited 1×
• Strunk v. New York Province of the Society of Jesus
  District of Columbia· 2010-03-10
• Peta Lindsay v. Debra Bowen
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-06
• Paige v. State of Vermont Sec'y of State
  Vermont Superior Court· 2016-01-15
• Paige v. State
  Vermont Superior Court· 2016-01-15
• McInnish v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2014-03-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Texas v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,234×
• United States v. Wong Kim Ark
  Supreme Court· 1898-03-28· cited 427×
• Rogers v. Bellei
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 92×
• Gottlieb v. Federal Election Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-05-22· cited 39×
• Hollander v. McCain
  D. New Hampshire· 2008-07-24· cited 23×