· 11/12/2013
Robinson v. Bandy
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 632
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 399
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3279
- 571 U.S. 1009
- 2013 WL 5975129
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing that the forum selection clause must \specifically preclude[ ]\ arbitration, but disagreeing that the clause must actually mention arbitration to do so
- finding that “all-inclusive and mandatory” language in a subsequent agreement superseded a prior agreement to arbitrate
- finding an agreement to arbitrate may be “supersede[d] by a later-executed agreement containing a forum-selection clause” if it specifically precludes arbitration
- noting “an agreement to arbitrate is superseded by a later-executed agreement containing a forum selection clause,” even if the forum selection clause does not specifically mention the former agreement to arbitrate
- affirming injunction of 18 an arbitration based on exclusive forum selection clause
- “In this Circuit, an agreement to arbitrate is superseded by a later-executed agreement containing a forum selection clause if the clause ‘specifically precludes’ arbitration.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.