Skip to main content
· 11/12/2013

Robinson v. Bandy

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 632
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 399
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3279
  • 571 U.S. 1009
  • 2013 WL 5975129
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that the forum selection clause must \specifically preclude[ ]\ arbitration, but disagreeing that the clause must actually mention arbitration to do so
  • finding that “all-inclusive and mandatory” language in a subsequent agreement superseded a prior agreement to arbitrate
  • finding an agreement to arbitrate may be “supersede[d] by a later-executed agreement containing a forum-selection clause” if it specifically precludes arbitration
  • noting “an agreement to arbitrate is superseded by a later-executed agreement containing a forum selection clause,” even if the forum selection clause does not specifically mention the former agreement to arbitrate
  • affirming injunction of 18 an arbitration based on exclusive forum selection clause
  • “In this Circuit, an agreement to arbitrate is superseded by a later-executed agreement containing a forum selection clause if the clause ‘specifically precludes’ arbitration.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.