Robinson v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a complaint must provide “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face” (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)
• finding that district court properly considered exhibits attached to both motion to dismiss and response in opposition because they were “integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint” and were authentic
• “This definition of merchantability incorporates trade quality standards and the consumer’s reasonable expectations into the concept of merchantability.”
• in reviewing a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), “court is not bound by the complaint’s legal conclusions”
• “[T]he facts alleged ‘must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level’ and must provide ‘enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’”
• “[T]he facts alleged ‘must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level’ and must provide ‘enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).