Robinson v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[m]andamus is the exclusive mechanism for reviewing [the Multi-District Litigation Panel’s] orders” and dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the appellants had not sought mandamus
• stating that generally the court does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal
• interpreting Arizona law and concluding homeowners had standing to sue and suffered a particularized injury when false documents were recorded against their properties
• “Nevada law requires that a trustor or mortgagor show a lack of default in order to proceed with a wrongful foreclosure claim.”
• “[A]rguments not raised in the district court will not be considered for the first time on appeal.”
• “Generally, arguments not raised in the district court will not be considered for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).