Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. Bradley
Citations
- 71 Wash. 611
- 129 P. 382
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1375
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Corporations — Public Work — Contractor’s Bond— Liability of Sureties — Conditions Precedent — Notice of Claim— Sufficiency. Letters from a materialman to a library board, informing the board of a balance due for materials furnished a contractor, and requesting prompt payment, without any reference to the contractor’s bond, do not constitute notice to the city in compliance with Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1161, providing, as a condition precedent to action on the bond, that a written notice be filed with the board that the material has been furnished and that a claim is made against the board for the amount due.</p> <p>Same. Actual notice to part of sureties would not bind the other sureties.</p> <p>Same. Such statute is not complied with by actual notice given to the sureties, at a meeting of the library board, that the bill of the materialman for material furnished the contractor had not been paid; since the statute requires written notice of a claim upon the bond.</p>
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1917-11-22· cited 14×
- People ex rel. New Jersey Terra Cotta Co. v. TravesMichigan Supreme Court· 1915-09-29· cited 11×
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court· 1918-02-08· cited 10×
- Walker v. LanningWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-08· cited 8×
- Rodgers v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court· 1916-01-15· cited 8×
- Culbert v. LindvallWashington Supreme Court· 1913-05-29· cited 7×
- Cascade Lumber & Shingle Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court· 1918-01-12· cited 7×
- Herren v. Kansas City Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-12-29· cited 3×
- Aberdeen State Bank v. Spokane Paving & Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1918-04-30
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-01-08· cited 30×
- Pearson v. LovejoyNew York Supreme Court· 1866-11-20· cited 25×
- Foley v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1896-07-01· cited 20×
- Strandell v. MoranWashington Supreme Court· 1908-06-02· cited 15×
- Crane Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-08-28· cited 9×
- Huggins v. SutherlandWashington Supreme Court· 1905-08-09· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Burns v. Supervisors of ElbaWisconsin Supreme Court· 1874-01-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.