Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• engaging in a comprehensive analysis of the statute and concluding that the requirement serves only to provide notice and therefore does not bar an action
• “a motion for reconsideration may not be used to plug gaps in an original argument or to argue in the alternative once a decision has been made”
• “In order for the plaintiff to have a cause of action for tortious interference of contract, it is axiomatic that there must be a breach of that contract by the other party.”
• “In order for the plaintiff to have a cause of action for tortious interference of contract, it is axiomatic that there must be a breach of that contract by the other party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).