Skip to main content

Robinette v. Robinette

Citations

  • 354 S.E.2d 808
  • 4 Va. App. 123
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 2151
  • 1987 Va. App. LEXIS 170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party cannot introduce parol evidence to show the existence of a trust if it would defeat or contradict the terms of an express agreement
  • where disposition of marital property is to be reconsidered on remand, the court must necessarily reexamine support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.