Skip to main content
· 1/30/1991

Robin E. Persons Estate of Kelly Persons and Timothy Persons v. United States

Citations

  • 925 F.2d 292
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 1266
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 797
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1191
  • 1991 WL 7946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that our Feres “jurisprudence has been guided by an increasing sense of awe for things military”
  • observing that our Feres “jurisprudence has been guided by an increasing sense of awe for things military”
  • “Seemingly manacled by precedent, this Circuit has repeatedly expressed its strong reservations [about the Feres doctrine] before ultimately overcoming them.”
  • affirming dismissal of a loss of consortium claim under Feres and noting the near-unanimous view among the circuits that “derivative” claims are barred by Feres
  • “[Pjractically any suit that ‘implicates the military judgments and decisions,’ runs the risk of colliding with Feres.”
  • barring wrongful death action because decedent died incident to service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Reinhardt, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.