Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules
• analyzing plaintiff’s separate “breach of fiduciary duty” and “breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing” claims as “a single claim for bad faith”
• “Choice- of-law is a question of law which [we] review[] de novo.” (citing Gen. Ceramics, Inc. v. Firemen’s Fund Ins. Cos., 66 F.3d 647, 651 (3d Cir. 1995))
• “Choice-of-law is a question of law which [we] review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).