Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs’ MCPA claim was dismissed because “the acts complained of [did] not involve the sale of ‘goods, property, or service primarily for personnel, family or household purposes’ ”
• “Since the coverage sought was not ‘primarily for personal, family or household purposes,’ the MCPA does not apply.”
• detailing the statutory scheme for enforcing UTPA violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).