Robertson v. Robertson
Citations
- 94 Miss. 645
- 47 So. 675
Syllabus
<p>Wills. Joint testaments. Revocation. Trusts. Covenant to stand seized. Husiand and wife. Clouds on title. Suits to remove.</p> <p>Where a husband and wife, by a writing stipulated to be operative both as a conveyance and as a will, agreed that on the death of either all of their property, owned at the date of the writing or thereafter acquired, should belong to the other for life, and, at the death of the survivor, should be divided, by commissioners to be appointed for that purpose, one-half to be allotted to their respective designated kindred:—</p> <p><a) Construing the instrument as a covenant to stand seized, the wife could not after the death of the husband, in the absence of fraud or mistake, maintain a suit to cancel it as a cloud on title and have the property, real or personal, vested in her; nor</p> <p>(5) Construing the writing as a mutual or joint will, can she revoke it as to the interest -disposed of by the deceased husband.</p>
Judges: Eletcuer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alvarez v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-16· cited 33×
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia· 1928-08-16· cited 26×
- Deseumeur v. RondelNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1909-11-19· cited 26×
- Jones v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court· 1924-12-15· cited 22×
- Monroe v. HollemanMississippi Supreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 12×
- Asher v. HartMississippi Supreme Court· 1951-12-10· cited 6×
- Dade County v. Carr-Well Estates, Inc.Miami-Dade County Circuit Court· 1969-06-16· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.