Robertson v. Ceola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an award for lost profits without determining whether they were within the contemplation of the parties as consequential damages where ‘loss of profits is naturally the proximate result of a breach of contract”
• proof of lost profits must be sufficient to remove the question from the realm of speculation and conjecture
• proof of lost profits must be sufficient to remove the question from the realm of speculation and conjecture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).