Roberts v. T.P. Three Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidence in the summary judgment record to support the appellants‘ claim that subsection (b) bars application of the limitations period to them
• concluding that there was no evidence in the summary judgment record to support the appellants‘ claim that subsection (b) bars application of the limitations period to them
• rejecting a generic “due process challenge” based in part on Pickens
• adverse possession claimant brought trespass to try title action against tax sale purchaser based on lack of notice and joinder in tax suit and sale
• an adverse-possession claimant brought a trespass to try title action against a tax sale purchaser based in part on lack of notice
• adverse possession claimant brought trespass to try title action against tax sale purchaser based on lack of notice and joinder in tax suit and sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).