Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 694 So. 2d 825
  • 1997 WL 266633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that mere acquiescence to instructions as given is not an affirmative agreement to the instruction
  • finding that defense counsel's mere acquiescence in jury instructions as given did not constitute affirmative agreement to omission of instructions on attempted manslaughter and definitions of justifiable and excusable homicide
  • noting that facts need not support a necessarily lesser included offense instruction
  • “Since defense counsel did not affirmatively agree to the omission of the instructions, but only acquiesced in the instructions as given, the exception does not apply.”
  • “Since defense counsel did not affirmatively agree to the omission of the instructions, but only acquiesced in the instructions as given, the exception does not apply.”
  • “Since defense counsel did not affirmatively agree to the omission of the [definitions of justifiable and excusable homicide when instructing on attempted manslaughter], but only acquiesced in the instructions as given, the [waiver] exception does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.