District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/30/1990
Roberts v. State
Citations
- 566 So. 2d 848
- 1990 WL 125102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court properly denied a motion to suppress where police observed a mirror with white powder in plain view
- noting that during a consensual encounter, “the use of a flashlight to illuminate the interior of a vehicle does not violate Fourth Amendment rights, even though an officer may specifically be looking at an area of suspicious activity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FutchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-26· cited 12×
- Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-18· cited 8×
- State v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-13· cited 7×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10· cited 4×
- State v. EchevarriaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-04
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Lightbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-15· cited 139×
- State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-31· cited 14×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-15· cited 11×
- State v. EckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 8×
- State v. BillingslyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.