Roberts v. Seeley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Ejxtrinsic and parol evidence is not admissible to create an ambiguity in a written agreement which is complete and clear and unambiguous upon its face.”
• when a contract is unambiguous, “extrinsic evidence such as the conduct of the parties may not be considered”
• “In cases of contract interpretation, it is well settled that “when parties set down their agreement in a clear, complete document, their writing should ... be enforced according to its terms.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).