Skip to main content
· 12/17/1958

Roberts v. Salot

Citations

  • 333 P.2d 232
  • 166 Cal. App. 2d 294
  • 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud
  • holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud
  • holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.