· 12/17/1958
Roberts v. Salot
Citations
- 333 P.2d 232
- 166 Cal. App. 2d 294
- 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud
- holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud
- holding that although only daughter had direct dealings with defendant, because she was acting as father’s agent, father had right of action for fraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ashburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.