Skip to main content

Roberts v. Roberts

Citations

  • 2003 SD 75
  • 666 N.W.2d 477
  • 2003 S.D. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a shareholder has the ability to control a distribution we deem it constructively received for child support purposes
  • holding that if a shareholder has the ability to control a distribution we deem it constructively received for child support purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbertson, Sabers, Konenkamp, Zinter, Lovrien, Meierhenry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.