Skip to main content

Roberts v. Roberts

Citations

  • 689 So. 2d 378
  • 1997 WL 78211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contingency fee cases which had actually been settled at the time of distribution could be considered marital property for purposes of equitable distribution
  • discussing valuation and distribution of attorney/husband’s contingency fee cases
  • discussing valuation and distribution of attorney/husband's contingency fee cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.