District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/26/1997
Roberts v. Roberts
Citations
- 689 So. 2d 378
- 1997 WL 78211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that contingency fee cases which had actually been settled at the time of distribution could be considered marital property for purposes of equitable distribution
- discussing valuation and distribution of attorney/husband’s contingency fee cases
- discussing valuation and distribution of attorney/husband's contingency fee cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-03-11· cited 26×
- Beers v. BeersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-23· cited 22×
- Stageberg v. StagebergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-06· cited 12×
- Caruso v. CarusoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-10· cited 11×
- Trans Health Management Inc. v. NunziataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-19· cited 6×
- Perkovich v. Humphrey-PerkovichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-26· cited 3×
- Silverman v. SilvermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26· cited 1×
- Ross v. RossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-13
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-01-07· cited 133×
- In Re Marriage of ZellsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 62×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-10· cited 45×
- DeLoach v. DeLoachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-21· cited 39×
- Whitfield v. WhitfieldNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-12-18· cited 36×
- Marriage of Garrett v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-02-23· cited 34×
- Metzner v. MetznerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-05-27· cited 27×
- Quinn v. QuinnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-28· cited 27×
- In Re the Marriage of VogtColorado Court of Appeals· 1989-04-13· cited 19×
- Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-11-17· cited 18×
- Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-07-03· cited 17×
- Kirkland v. KirklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-27· cited 13×
- Lyons v. LyonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-08-09· cited 13×
- Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.