Roberts v. Rich Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under \state of the art\ defense of N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-3(a)(1), defendant has burden of proving product was state of the art at the time of manufacture
• noting that “a product that satisfies the 3a(2) standard is, by statutory definition, not defectively designed”
• noting that “a product that satisfies the 3a(2) standard is, by statutory definition, not defectively designed”
• stating that defendant bears the burden of proving affirmative defenses in civil case
• stating defendant must establish state-of-the-art evidence by preponderance of evidence in order to prevail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).