Skip to main content
· 12/18/1975

Roberts v. Pevar ex rel. Pevar

Citations

  • 349 A.2d 866
  • 1975 Del. LEXIS 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “where, as here, we are firmly convinced the district court overlooked key facts, it is our duty to reverse”
  • concluding plaintiff ’s “economic situation doesn’t establish a ‘weakness of mind,’ significant ‘necessities or distress,’ . . . to establish a claim for undue influence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, Herrmann, McNeilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.