Skip to main content

Roberts v. People

Citations

  • 203 P.3d 513
  • 2009 WL 541609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the categorization of theft as either a misdemeanor or a particular class of felony depends on the value of the thing involved
  • noting that the language of the consolidated theft statute did not suggest an intent to create a separate and distinct crime of theft by deception that continues until the deception ends
  • “When a person commits theft twice or more within a period of six months . . . it is a class . . . felony.” (quoting § 18-4-401(4), C.R.S. (2008) (emphasis in original))
  • addressing \unit of prosecution\ for theft statute
  • addressing “unit of prosecution” for theft statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.