Roberts v. Landrum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• thirty-five percent increase in size constituted a substantial change warranting revocation of nonconforming sign’s legal status
• sign was not substantially same after increase in size of advertising panel by 224 square feet
• for limitations purposes, government’s claim for recovery of unpaid license fees accrued when fees became delinquent on the day following their due date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).