Skip to main content
· 8/31/2016

Roberts v. Gwinnett County

Citations

  • 225 F. Supp. 3d 1400
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188480
  • 2016 WL 7888043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the force majeure clause in the parties’ contract operated as an affirmative defense to bar plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim against defendant
  • recognizing that the force majeure clause in the parties’ contract operated as an affirmative defense to bar plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim against defendant
  • holding a force majeure clause that specifically identified a \power failure\ as a circumstance that would excuse performance
  • noting that the doctrine of force majeure can excuse a contracting party's performance when an unforeseen event makes that party's performance impossible or impracticable
  • “A force majeure clause must be construed, like any other contractual provision, in light of ’the contractual terms, the surrounding circumstances, and the purpose of the contract.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Totenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.