Roberts v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that opinions from reviewing physicians are “essentially worthless” when they do not have access to the full record
• \[T]he Social Security Administration defines gainful sedentary employment as comprising at least 6 hours of sitting and 2 hours of standing or walking[.]\
• correct to give non-treating doctors little weight who did not have access to plaintiff’s full medical record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).