Roberts v. Colonial Ford Truck Sales, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring ALJ to explain how ALJ accounted for plaintiff’s urinary impairments in RFC, given it was not originally discussed
• stating that evidence of frequent bathroom use is \highly relevant because the vocational expert testified that a person who must use the restroom more than once an hour would be unable to perform the few jobs that meet the ALJ's assessment\ of the claimant's RFC
• finding evidence of urinary incontinence “highly relevant” where a VE testified that a person who must use the restroom more than once an hour would be unable to perform the few jobs that met the ALJ’s assessment of an applicant’s REC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).