Skip to main content

Roberts v. Brooks

Citations

  • 649 P.2d 710
  • 1982 Alas. LEXIS 349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing because “[t]he [trial] court made no subsidiary findings which would enable us to understand the steps by which it reached this ultimate conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Compton, Connor, Itz, Matthews, Rabinow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.