Skip to main content
· 7/1/1991

ROBERTS

Citations

  • 20 I. & N. Dec. 294

Syllabus

ROBERTS, 20 I&N Dec. 294 (BIA 1991) ID 3148 (PDF) (1) An applicant fora waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(c) of the Immigration andNationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1988), who is an aggravatedfelon is not required to meet a heightened discretionary test beyond therequirements set forth in Matter of Marin, 16 I&N Dec. 581 (BIA 1978),Matter of Buscemi, 19 I&N Dec. 628 (BIA 1988), and Matter of Edwards,20 I&N Dec. 3134 (BIA 1990). (2) A sole convictionfor the felony sale of a controlled substance is sufficient to supporta determination that the respondent is a drug trafficker within the meaningof section 101(a)(43) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) (1988). (3) The immigration judge,in exercising his discretion to grant section 212(c) relief, may not considerevidence on a theory of entrapment after the introduction of the respondent'sconviction record because such theory directly relates to the issue of the respondent's ultimate guilt or innocence.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.